Blog | Investors
MPS Limited, MPS Technologies, Publishing Solution, Content Creation, Content Development
  • Learning Solutions
    • eLearning Solutions
    • Experience Center Design
    • Experiential Learning Design
    • Consulting Services
    • Learning Platforms
    • A
  • Platforms
    • Content Workflow and Production
    • DigiCore
    • MPSTrak
    • Content Management, Hosting, and Delivery
    • mag+
    • THINK365
    • ScholarStor
    • Usage Analytics
    • ScholarlyStats
    • MPSInsight
    • Custom Development and Support
    • A
  • Content Solutions
    • Publishing Solutions
    • Content Authoring and Development
    • Digital Transformation
    • Accessibility Solutions
    • Marketing and Customer Support
    • A
  • About Us
    • MPS Turns 50
    • Overview
    • Board of Directors
    • Corporate Social Responsibility
    • Press Releases
    • Locations
    • A
  • Why MPS
    • Testimonials
    • Success Stories
    • Certifications
    • A

Open Access – the future of publishing

June 19, 2020MPS LTD.

Open Access – the future of publishing

Open Access – the future of publishing

To many, the idea of open access is a no-brainer. Governments, public bodies, and other institutions sponsor research, often with taxpayer’s money. Authors, supported by such endowments, research a scientific topic of interest or examine a critical subject in humanities, often collaborating with each other. Their articles are reviewed by peers – usually experts in the field – and published and distributed by a journal publisher. The publishers charge a subscription fee for the journal containing the article, which any reader – for science, technology, and medical journal, the reader is typically a fellow researcher – must pay for accessing the content. For a large, reputed publisher, an article may cost as high as $10. Why then, the authors argue, should the readers pay for the content to the publisher when they do not charge for writing it? Is it fair to the fraternity of researchers? What about those from emerging economies who want to make valuable contributions but are blocked by paywalls?

OA Models – Gold and Green

Hence Open Access. Simply put, Open Access means freedom to read and freedom to reuse, or as Peter Suber, one of its chief proponents put it, it is royalty-free literature. Broadly, there are two Open Access models – Gold OA and Green OA. Under Gold OA, the journals arrange for peer review. Springer and Wiley (Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies) are among many publishers that bring out several journals under this model. Green OA differs from Gold OA in that it does not support peer review. It’s a self-archiving model. That is, authors can publish certain versions, typically the pre-print version of the article before it was given to the journal for publication or even the post-print version, in OA repositories such as arXiv. Some of these OA repositories also allow the article to be made available after an embargo period.

Publishing Costs and Business Models under OA

Note that Open Access does not mean that there are no costs. A non-profit OA publisher may incur a cost of $1500 on average per article. For large journal publications, it may go as high as $4000 per article. According to a report that studied publishing costs across the UK, publishers incur costs of publication (typesetting, etc.) and distribution, both of which minus non-peer review costs make up 3% of total costs. Some publishers invest in innovation to develop tools to support the research fraternity. Thus, a publisher has significant costs; subscription fee is one of the many ways to recover them.

There are many business models that publishers can consider. Usually, the sponsor of the author bears the cost of the article, drily called Article Processing Costs (APC). Some publishers give options for a block purchase of APCs with lucrative discounts. Still, others waive the fee for authors whose institutions have purchased an annual membership. Suber estimates that about 75% of all OA publishers do not charge APC; when a fee is charged, it is borne by the sponsor in 88% of the cases. Almost all journal publishers have a hybrid model of publishing; some of the content is available under OA while the rest remains behind a paywall. A study estimates that between 2009 and 2016, the number of journals with the hybrid model has grown from 2000 to 10000.

Despite this, OA journals still comprise only 5-9% of the market value, according to a study. So why should publishers consider OA model? Primarily because of growth. With the rise of offsetting agreements and the growth of powerful library consortia, the popularity of OA is on the rise. More than 50% of library publishers have started collaborating with learned societies, non-profit publishing houses that are contributing to research development, and the journals published by them are OA. Clearly, OA is there to stay.

As libraries and institutions drive hard-nosed negotiations, we will see more and more OA-based offerings in the future. As a result, publishers will have to ensure wider content delivery options, with a great focus on digital publishing.

Sources –

  1. http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm
  2. The STM report, 2018
  3. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2018/02/22/open-access-technology-options/
  4. https://bit.ly/2YIQHc0

Top Trending

  • How to Keep Young Learners Engaged with eLearning?
    August 1, 2018
  • HTML 5Truly responsive HTML5 content with mag+
    July 15, 2020
  • Is Your Platform Providing the Right ReportsIs Your Platform Providing the Right Reports? (COUNTER)
    June 20, 2019
  • Publishing TechnologyDigital Transformation of the Publishing Industry
    July 5, 2018
  • Digital Publishing SolutionsOptimize your Publishing Workflow with DigiCore
    July 11, 2018
  • Digital AccessingThe Relevance of DOI in Accessing Digital Content
    December 7, 2018
  • Rights and PermissionsRights Management Technology: Solving Business Challenges (Part 3)
    June 11, 2020
  • Usage AnalyticsWhy academic publishers must leverage analytics
    July 9, 2020
  • Media Asset DevelopmentHow to Map Out Digital Asset Management Strategy
    January 7, 2020
  • Editing Versus ProofreadingEditing Versus Proofreading
    August 15, 2018

Related Articles

Digital Publishing Solutions

September 7, 2018MPS LTD.

How to manage article processing charges for publishers?

June 16, 2020MPS LTD.

Optimize your Publishing Workflow with DigiCore

July 11, 2018MPS LTD.
Platforms
  • DigiCore
  • MPSTrak
  • mag+
  • THINK365
    • Order Management and Delivery
    • Content Hosting and Delivery
    • Usage Analytics
    • THINK365 Services
  • ScholarStor
  • ScholarlyStats
  • MPSInsight
Content Solutions
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Content Authoring and Development
  • Digital Transformation
  • Accessibility Solutions
  • Marketing and Customer Support
About Us
  • Overview
  • Board of Directors
  • Corporate Social Responsibility
  • Press Releases
  • Locations
Why MPS
  • Testimonials
  • Success Stories
  • Certifications
Others
  • Blog
  • Investors
  • SMART ODR

© 2025, MPS Limited - All rights reserved
Privacy Notice

This website uses cookies to enhance your digital experience. For additional details please visit Privacy Notice and Cookie Policy

MPS Ltd Logo
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the website work as you expect it to and give you a more personalized web experience. We respect your right to privacy, so you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can accept or refuse our use of cookies, by moving the selector switch in each category to change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer you.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.

Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!

Social Media Cookies

These cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!

Registration cookies

There are several ways you may register with a MPS’ site, for example you may register our forms for requesting a demo, contact us, subscribe to a newsletter, or register for an event.

While you have registered one of our contact forms in our sites, we combine information from your registration cookies with analytics cookies, which we could use to identify which pages you have seen on our sites.

Request Demo Contact Us